Happy Days Farm

 

HOME PAGE

HOLY GRAIL

Bottom of Page

Valley Forge


 

Wednesday, March 7, 2001  

Vanguard presents vision of Uwchlan campus 
 

The first phase would allow Happy Days Farm to continue operating. Construction could start in the spring of 2002. 

LIONVILLE - Ralph Packard, chief financial officer of the Vanguard Group, told the Exton Chamber of Commerce at a luncheon yesterday that his company could start construction on its proposed Uwchlan campus as early as the spring of 2002.


 

If after one-hundred years have passed, and "The Happy Days Farm" still exists,
how wise would we be thought of by those who will play upon the green fields.

Sunday July 9, 2000.Westward expansion happened a very long time ago.
 It took from the 1930' till now to create a fragile recovery 
in the vast amount of Natural Resource,
that was squandered for that which no longer exists today.
        Look East to the Delaware where enters the SCHUYLKILL RIVER.
There is the place where the future must be built to the best of our achievements.


 


  Monday, May 22, 2000

 Ridge expected to visit Vanguard

 TREDYFFRIN - Gov. Ridge is scheduled to travel to the Vanguard Group's corporate headquarters today to announce a $55 million aid package that would help Vanguard create as many as 6,000 jobs in Chester County over the next five years.

The deal includes tax breaks and other state aid that persuaded the mutual fund company to expand in Chester County.

Vanguard, the nation's second-largest mutual-fund firm, plans to build an office park on a 245-acre tract near the Downingtown interchange of the Pennsylvania Turnpike in Uwchlan to accommodate future growth. It will keep its headquarters in Tredyffrin.

Vanguard considered sites in several other states, including New Jersey and Delaware, before settling on Chester County, where the company is the largest employer.

Vanguard is expected to invest about $500 million, and the state incentives will cover about 10 percent of the cost. In return, the state expects to get about $40 million a year in income taxes from Vanguard employees.


top of page

Wednesday, May 24, 2000

Vanguard should set a good environmental example

 While the celebration goes on about keeping the Vanguard Group in Pennsylvania ( "Vanguard and Ridge are happy with the deal," May 23) and while elected officials jump through all kinds of financial hoops to ensure that Vanguard is made to feel like the "golden child," Vanguard has ignored the pleas from the environmental community. Shouldn't Vanguard, above all, be the shining example of a good corporate neighbor, in particular, by employing the best environmental design to its expanding facility?

Or because of its "favorite son" status, is the company exempt from the environmental laws? The case in point is the lack of stormwater recharge with the expansion of its site in Tredyffrin Township. This facility is on Valley Creek, which is designated an "exceptional value" watershed. Valley Creek is at great risk of being degraded by the lack of stormwater recharge and by the high volumes of water flooding through this fragile natural treasure.

The Valley Creek Coalition has met many times with a variety of company representatives to express the importance and need to incorporate stormwater infiltration into Vanguard's expansion design. Time and again, these dialogs have produced no positive results. The Valley Forge National Historical Park, also a member of the coalition, has separately met and appealed to Vanguard to be a good corporate neighbor and employ stormwater infiltration into its design. This is particularly important to the park because it receives all of the stormwater that is released from the numerous upstream detention basins.

It is time that Vanguard got off its high horse and demonstrated good environmental stewardship and prove that it is worthy of all the subsidies being bestowed upon it - subsides made up of taxpayer dollars.

Vanguard, the toast of all this goodwill, should now earn it.

John Hoekstra

Birchrunville

(The author is director of watershed advocacy for Green Valleys Association.)

top of page


Gov. Ridge's Holdings 

  Wednesday, June 14, 2000

The value of Gov. Ridge's stock holdings:
Spectrum Control Inc. of Erie, $11,500

Viacom, $14,105
Merck & Co., $14,650
Steris Corp. of Ohio, $2,042
Penn Attorneys Title Insurance of Erie, $15,322
Advance Tissue Sciences of California, $2,025
Nike, $1,950
General Electric, $30,720
Walt Disney Co., $4,020
Ikon Office Solutions of Malvern, $3,050
Lucent Technology, $11,820
Pfizer, $9,168
Coca-Cola, $5,340
Cisco Systems, $13,000
Ridge also owns shares in two mutual funds:
Davis Financial Services of Arizona, $16,206
IDS Securities of Minnesota, undisclosed


Ridge sold shares in the following stocks:
Tollgrade Communications
TWA
General Electric


 

  Friday, June 23, 2000

Anti-sprawl law signed by Ridge

The governor deemed the legislation essential to putting brakes on the state's haphazard patterns of growth.

By Nancy Petersen
INQUIRER STAFF WRITER

WEST BRADFORD - Against the backdrop of a signature Chester County landscape, Gov. Ridge signed into law yesterday the state's most ambitious effort to control sprawl in more than 30 years.

"I truly believe this is one of the most important pieces of legislation the General Assembly and the Governor's Office have worked together to create," said Ridge. "These bills will help Pennsylvania grow smarter in the 21st century."

Later in the day, in Delaware County, Ridge signed a law providing for $25 million in grants to the state's often cash-strapped volunteer fire and ambulance companies.

At the Chester County site, surrounded by local and state officials, Ridge praised State Sen. James W. Gerlach (R., Chester) and Rep. David J. Steil (R., Bucks) for their tenacity in seeing their landmark growth-management bills through the legislative gauntlet.

More than 100 people attended the signing ceremony, which was held on the Albertson-Yerkes farm on the western edge of the village of Marshallton.

By providing strong incentives for municipalities to plan for growth together, the measures aim reverse the effects of decades of court decisions that forced municipalities to allow for every conceivable land use within their borders. If they failed to do so, they were often subject to expensive and lengthy court battles with developers.

The result has been sprawl spreading across the landscape, eating up prime farmland, driving up the costs of providing services and strangling economic growth. In some areas of the state, especially in Southeastern Pennsylvania, the rate of growth has exceeded an acre an hour.

Besides adding protection from legal challenges, the incentives for multi-municipal planning include the ability to designate growth areas and eligibility for priority state funding. They also free municipalities from having to plan for every type of land use.

And, for the first time, they allow municipalities to transfer development rights across their boundaries, a concept that encourages growth in areas that have the infrastructure to support it.

Ridge, who has been hailed nationally as a leader in the anti-sprawl movement, promised to use the powers of his office to ensure that the wishes of local governments are adhered to when state agencies are making decisions about economic development.

He ticked off several agencies, including the Departments of Environmental Protection, Agriculture, and Economic Development, that will be the leaders in this effort.

"We will scrub them all up and figure out ways to make their decisions consistent with the goals of the legislation," Ridge said after his signing speech.

He signed the bills in a field on a 110-acre farm that was permanently preserved in 1997 when its development rights were purchased by a developer and transferred several miles away to another subdivision site in West Bradford Township.

The two measures, which Ridge and others said were Pennsylvania's answer to combating sprawl without threatening economic growth, private property rights, or the prerogatives of local government, passed by wide margins in the legislature. Both survived last-minute, special-interest amendments designed to weaken their impact.

In the end, representatives of local government, conservationists, homebuilders and farmers came together to reach a consensus, clearing the way for the bills to pass. Gerlach said that without this consensus, success would have been out of reach.

"It's a very Pennsylvania approach," said Joanne Denworth, president of 10,000 Friends of Pennsylvania, a key player in the bills' passage. "We have this tradition in Pennsylvania of local government. This doesn't change that."

"This is a great day for Pennsylvania," said Steil, who credited the Governor's Office with tweaking the final language and with "opening a few doors and closing others" in the final days of the debate.

Ridge said the laws put an end to the arguments that economic growth and environmental protection cannot coexist. He called the effort to define this debate as a battle between jobs and the environment "the politics of false choices."





Inquirer suburban staff writer Mark Stroh contributed to this article

 



last revised July 9, 2000


top of page